State Electoral District of Blacktown

Summary of First Preference Votes Polled for Each Candidate

Electors Enrolled: 49,412
Voter Turnout: 93.4%
Informal Rate: 4.5%

ROBERTSON John was declared elected on 5 April 2011

Results Explanation

The District Summary page displays the summary of First Preference Votes polled for each candidate.

The TCP votes and percentage of total formal votes counted for each candidate will progressively display against each candidate's name during the following election status categories:

  • Election Night Commenced
  • Final for Election Night
  • Check-Count and Dec-Vote Commenced
  • Check Count Completed (without Town Hall)
  • Check Count Completed (Town Hall only)
  • Check Count Completed
  • Dec-Vote Count Completed
  • Recount Pending
  • Final Result
  • Candidate Declared Elected
Two Candidate Preferred (Post Election Night)
CandidatePartyVotes% Total
SILJEG Karlo LP 17,910 46.3 bar
ROBERTSON John ALP+ 20,796 53.7 bar

   + Sitting Candidate or Party

Results Explanation

First preference votes and percentage of first preference votes of total formal votes counted will progressively display against each candidate's name during the following election status categories:

  • Election Night Commenced
  • Final for Election Night
  • Check-Count and Dec-Vote Commenced
  • Check Count Completed (without Town Hall)
  • Check Count Completed (Town Hall only)
  • Check Count Completed
  • Dec-Vote Count Completed
  • Recount Pending
  • Final Result
  • Candidate Declared Elected
First Preference Votes
Election NightCheck CountCheck Count & Dec
CandidateParty%Votes%Votes%§Votes
OLLINGSOS2.68682.68522.71,177
SILJEGLP36.211,85736.111,84236.416,047
GESLINGCDP6.22,0216.22,0296.02,639
COULTERIND2.58302.58322.61,152
KEDWELLIND2.58112.58122.61,166
TAYLORGNS5.11,6805.21,7215.62,473
ROBERTSONALP+44.914,72144.914,73944.119,419
Total Formal Votes Counted32,78832,82744,073
Informal1,7211,7002,074
Total Votes Counted34,50934,52746,147

   + Sitting Candidate or Party
   § Figures displayed have been rounded to the nearest decimal place. Note the rounding process makes the displayed value an
     unreliable indicator, if it is within a decimal place of the required threshold, for deposit refund or public funding.