State Electoral District of Coogee

Summary of First Preference Votes Polled for Each Candidate

Electors Enrolled: 49,131
Voter Turnout: 89.4%
Informal Rate: 2.4%

NOTLEY-SMITH Bruce was declared elected on 5 April 2011

Results Explanation

The District Summary page displays the summary of First Preference Votes polled for each candidate.

The TCP votes and percentage of total formal votes counted for each candidate will progressively display against each candidate's name during the following election status categories:

  • Election Night Commenced
  • Final for Election Night
  • Check-Count and Dec-Vote Commenced
  • Check Count Completed (without Town Hall)
  • Check Count Completed (Town Hall only)
  • Check Count Completed
  • Dec-Vote Count Completed
  • Recount Pending
  • Final Result
  • Candidate Declared Elected
Two Candidate Preferred (Post Election Night)
CandidatePartyVotes% Total
NOTLEY-SMITH Bruce LP 21,987 58.2 bar
PEARCE Paul+ ALP+ 15,762 41.8 bar

   + Sitting Candidate or Party

Results Explanation

First preference votes and percentage of first preference votes of total formal votes counted will progressively display against each candidate's name during the following election status categories:

  • Election Night Commenced
  • Final for Election Night
  • Check-Count and Dec-Vote Commenced
  • Check Count Completed (without Town Hall)
  • Check Count Completed (Town Hall only)
  • Check Count Completed
  • Dec-Vote Count Completed
  • Recount Pending
  • Final Result
  • Candidate Declared Elected
First Preference Votes
Election NightCheck CountCheck Count & Dec
CandidateParty%Votes%Votes%§Votes
BURNEYIND2.06042.06042.0868
McGOWANCDP1.33791.33791.4581
DORANGNS22.36,72622.36,73422.09,449
NOTLEY-SMITHLP46.314,00246.414,01547.120,224
PEARCE+ALP+26.07,85626.07,85325.210,828
JONESIND2.16472.16482.2956
Total Formal Votes Counted30,21430,23342,906
Informal7998131,035
Total Votes Counted31,01331,04643,941

   + Sitting Candidate or Party
   § Figures displayed have been rounded to the nearest decimal place. Note the rounding process makes the displayed value an
     unreliable indicator, if it is within a decimal place of the required threshold, for deposit refund or public funding.