State Electoral District of Castle Hill

Summary of First Preference Votes Polled for Each Candidate

Electors Enrolled: 51,963
Voter Turnout: 93.7%
Informal Rate: 2.9%

PERROTTET Dominic was declared elected on 5 April 2011

Results Explanation

The District Summary page displays the summary of First Preference Votes polled for each candidate.

The TCP votes and percentage of total formal votes counted for each candidate will progressively display against each candidate's name during the following election status categories:

  • Election Night Commenced
  • Final for Election Night
  • Check-Count and Dec-Vote Commenced
  • Check Count Completed (without Town Hall)
  • Check Count Completed (Town Hall only)
  • Check Count Completed
  • Dec-Vote Count Completed
  • Recount Pending
  • Final Result
  • Candidate Declared Elected
Two Candidate Preferred (Post Election Night)
CandidatePartyVotes% Total
PERROTTET Dominic LP+ 34,421 80.8 bar
TRACEY Ryan ALP 8,163 19.2 bar

   + Sitting Candidate or Party

Results Explanation

First preference votes and percentage of first preference votes of total formal votes counted will progressively display against each candidate's name during the following election status categories:

  • Election Night Commenced
  • Final for Election Night
  • Check-Count and Dec-Vote Commenced
  • Check Count Completed (without Town Hall)
  • Check Count Completed (Town Hall only)
  • Check Count Completed
  • Dec-Vote Count Completed
  • Recount Pending
  • Final Result
  • Candidate Declared Elected
First Preference Votes
Election NightCheck CountCheck Count & Dec
CandidateParty%Votes%Votes%§Votes
KATSOULASFF2.17292.17312.21,025
WALLBANKGNS7.52,6277.52,6477.93,717
MOUNTIFIELDCDP3.71,3153.71,3143.71,765
MENDHAMIND3.11,1003.21,1413.41,609
PERROTTETLP+69.124,30069.024,29868.732,466
TRACEYALP14.55,08914.45,06914.26,690
Total Formal Votes Counted35,16035,20047,272
Informal1,1341,1371,414
Total Votes Counted36,29436,33748,686

   + Sitting Candidate or Party
   § Figures displayed have been rounded to the nearest decimal place. Note the rounding process makes the displayed value an
     unreliable indicator, if it is within a decimal place of the required threshold, for deposit refund or public funding.