State Electoral District of Campbelltown

Summary of First Preference Votes Polled for Each Candidate

Electors Enrolled: 45,458
Voter Turnout: 93.0%
Informal Rate: 4.4%

DOYLE Bryan was declared elected on 5 April 2011

Results Explanation

The District Summary page displays the summary of First Preference Votes polled for each candidate.

The TCP votes and percentage of total formal votes counted for each candidate will progressively display against each candidate's name during the following election status categories:

  • Election Night Commenced
  • Final for Election Night
  • Check-Count and Dec-Vote Commenced
  • Check Count Completed (without Town Hall)
  • Check Count Completed (Town Hall only)
  • Check Count Completed
  • Dec-Vote Count Completed
  • Recount Pending
  • Final Result
  • Candidate Declared Elected
Two Candidate Preferred (Post Election Night)
CandidatePartyVotes% Total
DOYLE Bryan LP 19,510 53.4 bar
BLEASDALE Nick ALP+ 17,046 46.6 bar

   + Sitting Candidate or Party

Results Explanation

First preference votes and percentage of first preference votes of total formal votes counted will progressively display against each candidate's name during the following election status categories:

  • Election Night Commenced
  • Final for Election Night
  • Check-Count and Dec-Vote Commenced
  • Check Count Completed (without Town Hall)
  • Check Count Completed (Town Hall only)
  • Check Count Completed
  • Dec-Vote Count Completed
  • Recount Pending
  • Final Result
  • Candidate Declared Elected
First Preference Votes
Election NightCheck CountCheck Count & Dec
CandidateParty%Votes%Votes%§Votes
DOYLELP43.914,02944.314,17644.918,152
BLEASDALEALP+40.112,81839.512,64038.615,618
KINGSLEYIND4.81,5324.91,5625.02,015
WALDRON HAHNGNS6.32,0286.42,0366.62,677
WRIGHTCDP4.91,5644.91,5614.81,957
Total Formal Votes Counted31,97131,97540,419
Informal1,6051,6051,854
Total Votes Counted33,57633,58042,273

   + Sitting Candidate or Party
   § Figures displayed have been rounded to the nearest decimal place. Note the rounding process makes the displayed value an
     unreliable indicator, if it is within a decimal place of the required threshold, for deposit refund or public funding.