State Electoral District of Wollondilly

Summary of First Preference Votes Polled for Each Candidate

Electors Enrolled: 50,340
Voter Turnout: 94.5%
Informal Rate: 4.6%

ROWELL Jai was declared elected on 5 April 2011

Results Explanation

The District Summary page displays the summary of First Preference Votes polled for each candidate.

The TCP votes and percentage of total formal votes counted for each candidate will progressively display against each candidate's name during the following election status categories:

  • Election Night Commenced
  • Final for Election Night
  • Check-Count and Dec-Vote Commenced
  • Check Count Completed (without Town Hall)
  • Check Count Completed (Town Hall only)
  • Check Count Completed
  • Dec-Vote Count Completed
  • Recount Pending
  • Final Result
  • Candidate Declared Elected
Two Candidate Preferred (Post Election Night)
CandidatePartyVotes% Total
ROWELL Jai LP 24,861 64.7 bar
COSTA Phil+ CL 13,559 35.3 bar

   + Sitting Candidate or Party

Results Explanation

First preference votes and percentage of first preference votes of total formal votes counted will progressively display against each candidate's name during the following election status categories:

  • Election Night Commenced
  • Final for Election Night
  • Check-Count and Dec-Vote Commenced
  • Check Count Completed (without Town Hall)
  • Check Count Completed (Town Hall only)
  • Check Count Completed
  • Dec-Vote Count Completed
  • Recount Pending
  • Final Result
  • Candidate Declared Elected
First Preference Votes
Election NightCheck CountCheck Count & Dec
CandidateParty%Votes%Votes%§Votes
MEADORP4.41,5374.41,5414.62,104
DALTONCDP3.71,3073.71,3023.71,669
HANNANIND11.64,09311.64,06811.04,971
ROWELLLP49.917,54550.017,54949.922,632
DI BLASIOGNS5.01,7705.01,7735.42,432
COSTA+CL25.38,88725.38,89925.511,558
Total Formal Votes Counted35,13935,13245,366
Informal1,8051,8402,183
Total Votes Counted36,94436,97247,549

   + Sitting Candidate or Party
   § Figures displayed have been rounded to the nearest decimal place. Note the rounding process makes the displayed value an
     unreliable indicator, if it is within a decimal place of the required threshold, for deposit refund or public funding.