State Electoral District of Upper Hunter

Summary of First Preference Votes Polled for Each Candidate

Electors Enrolled: 49,334
Voter Turnout: 93.7%
Informal Rate: 2.8%

SOURIS George was declared elected on 5 April 2011

Results Explanation

The District Summary page displays the summary of First Preference Votes polled for each candidate.

The TCP votes and percentage of total formal votes counted for each candidate will progressively display against each candidate's name during the following election status categories:

  • Election Night Commenced
  • Final for Election Night
  • Check-Count and Dec-Vote Commenced
  • Check Count Completed (without Town Hall)
  • Check Count Completed (Town Hall only)
  • Check Count Completed
  • Dec-Vote Count Completed
  • Recount Pending
  • Final Result
  • Candidate Declared Elected
Two Candidate Preferred (Post Election Night)
CandidatePartyVotes% Total
GIBBONS Michael CL 10,087 26.7 bar
SOURIS George+ NP+ 27,723 73.3 bar

   + Sitting Candidate or Party

Results Explanation

First preference votes and percentage of first preference votes of total formal votes counted will progressively display against each candidate's name during the following election status categories:

  • Election Night Commenced
  • Final for Election Night
  • Check-Count and Dec-Vote Commenced
  • Check Count Completed (without Town Hall)
  • Check Count Completed (Town Hall only)
  • Check Count Completed
  • Dec-Vote Count Completed
  • Recount Pending
  • Final Result
  • Candidate Declared Elected
First Preference Votes
Election NightCheck CountCheck Count & Dec
CandidateParty%Votes%Votes%§Votes
GIBBONSCL17.35,13217.35,14217.98,047
DUDDYIND20.56,06420.56,06419.38,653
COWLEYCDP2.57552.67582.51,109
SOURIS+NP+54.116,04054.116,04454.724,555
PARKERGNS5.51,6415.51,6435.72,563
Total Formal Votes Counted29,63229,65144,927
Informal9609561,276
Total Votes Counted30,59230,60746,203

   + Sitting Candidate or Party
   § Figures displayed have been rounded to the nearest decimal place. Note the rounding process makes the displayed value an
     unreliable indicator, if it is within a decimal place of the required threshold, for deposit refund or public funding.