State Electoral District of The Entrance

Summary of First Preference Votes Polled for Each Candidate

Electors Enrolled: 49,942
Voter Turnout: 93.4%
Informal Rate: 3.5%

SPENCE Chris was declared elected on 5 April 2011

Results Explanation

The District Summary page displays the summary of First Preference Votes polled for each candidate.

The TCP votes and percentage of total formal votes counted for each candidate will progressively display against each candidate's name during the following election status categories:

  • Election Night Commenced
  • Final for Election Night
  • Check-Count and Dec-Vote Commenced
  • Check Count Completed (without Town Hall)
  • Check Count Completed (Town Hall only)
  • Check Count Completed
  • Dec-Vote Count Completed
  • Recount Pending
  • Final Result
  • Candidate Declared Elected
Two Candidate Preferred (Post Election Night)
CandidatePartyVotes% Total
MEHAN David ALP+ 14,880 37.5 bar
SPENCE Chris LP 24,760 62.5 bar

   + Sitting Candidate or Party

Results Explanation

First preference votes and percentage of first preference votes of total formal votes counted will progressively display against each candidate's name during the following election status categories:

  • Election Night Commenced
  • Final for Election Night
  • Check-Count and Dec-Vote Commenced
  • Check Count Completed (without Town Hall)
  • Check Count Completed (Town Hall only)
  • Check Count Completed
  • Dec-Vote Count Completed
  • Recount Pending
  • Final Result
  • Candidate Declared Elected
First Preference Votes
Election NightCheck CountCheck Count & Dec
CandidateParty%Votes%Votes%§Votes
MEHANALP+28.99,34528.99,36329.013,057
MIROVICCDP4.91,5724.91,5714.62,083
SPENCELP50.616,35450.616,35850.922,898
BONDFF4.61,4894.61,4994.62,082
JINKSGNS11.03,55511.03,56010.84,877
Total Formal Votes Counted32,31532,35144,997
Informal1,3451,3171,633
Total Votes Counted33,66033,66846,630

   + Sitting Candidate or Party
   § Figures displayed have been rounded to the nearest decimal place. Note the rounding process makes the displayed value an
     unreliable indicator, if it is within a decimal place of the required threshold, for deposit refund or public funding.