State Electoral District of Riverstone

Summary of First Preference Votes Polled for Each Candidate

Electors Enrolled: 57,408
Voter Turnout: 93.6%
Informal Rate: 4.0%

CONOLLY Kevin was declared elected on 5 April 2011

Results Explanation

The District Summary page displays the summary of First Preference Votes polled for each candidate.

The TCP votes and percentage of total formal votes counted for each candidate will progressively display against each candidate's name during the following election status categories:

  • Election Night Commenced
  • Final for Election Night
  • Check-Count and Dec-Vote Commenced
  • Check Count Completed (without Town Hall)
  • Check Count Completed (Town Hall only)
  • Check Count Completed
  • Dec-Vote Count Completed
  • Recount Pending
  • Final Result
  • Candidate Declared Elected
Two Candidate Preferred (Post Election Night)
CandidatePartyVotes% Total
CONOLLY Kevin LP 31,888 70.2 bar
VASSILI Michael ALP+ 13,555 29.8 bar

   + Sitting Candidate or Party

Results Explanation

First preference votes and percentage of first preference votes of total formal votes counted will progressively display against each candidate's name during the following election status categories:

  • Election Night Commenced
  • Final for Election Night
  • Check-Count and Dec-Vote Commenced
  • Check Count Completed (without Town Hall)
  • Check Count Completed (Town Hall only)
  • Check Count Completed
  • Dec-Vote Count Completed
  • Recount Pending
  • Final Result
  • Candidate Declared Elected
First Preference Votes
Election NightCheck CountCheck Count & Dec
CandidateParty%Votes%Votes%§Votes
CORNELIUSFF3.01,1703.01,1803.31,701
BONHAMIND2.81,1032.81,1122.81,445
CONOLLYLP58.323,05458.223,04458.129,971
GREENCDP4.11,6364.21,6464.22,178
BELCASTROIND1.55981.55991.5791
VASSILIALP+23.69,34023.69,35223.312,013
PETTITT1.24701.24741.1585
HARWOODGNS5.52,1635.52,1785.72,943
Total Formal Votes Counted39,53439,58551,627
Informal1,7021,7802,127
Total Votes Counted41,23641,36553,754

   + Sitting Candidate or Party
   § Figures displayed have been rounded to the nearest decimal place. Note the rounding process makes the displayed value an
     unreliable indicator, if it is within a decimal place of the required threshold, for deposit refund or public funding.