State Electoral District of Ku-ring-gai

Summary of First Preference Votes Polled for Each Candidate

Electors Enrolled: 49,900
Voter Turnout: 92.7%
Informal Rate: 1.7%

O'FARRELL Barry was declared elected on 5 April 2011

Results Explanation

The District Summary page displays the summary of First Preference Votes polled for each candidate.

The TCP votes and percentage of total formal votes counted for each candidate will progressively display against each candidate's name during the following election status categories:

  • Election Night Commenced
  • Final for Election Night
  • Check-Count and Dec-Vote Commenced
  • Check Count Completed (without Town Hall)
  • Check Count Completed (Town Hall only)
  • Check Count Completed
  • Dec-Vote Count Completed
  • Recount Pending
  • Final Result
  • Candidate Declared Elected
Two Candidate Preferred (Post Election Night)
CandidatePartyVotes% Total
ARMSTRONG David ALP 5,236 13.0 bar
O'FARRELL Barry+ LP+ 34,904 87.0 bar

   + Sitting Candidate or Party

Results Explanation

First preference votes and percentage of first preference votes of total formal votes counted will progressively display against each candidate's name during the following election status categories:

  • Election Night Commenced
  • Final for Election Night
  • Check-Count and Dec-Vote Commenced
  • Check Count Completed (without Town Hall)
  • Check Count Completed (Town Hall only)
  • Check Count Completed
  • Dec-Vote Count Completed
  • Recount Pending
  • Final Result
  • Candidate Declared Elected
First Preference Votes
Election NightCheck CountCheck Count & Dec
CandidateParty%Votes%Votes%§Votes
ARMSTRONGALP7.62,6047.72,6137.93,590
WISZNIEWSKICDP2.17022.17112.1948
O'FARRELL+LP+72.924,84272.724,79672.733,061
GUTMANORP1.13701.13711.2536
GEMMELLGNS14.14,79314.24,82914.16,395
BOURKESOS2.37702.37782.1952
Total Formal Votes Counted34,08134,09845,482
Informal638628794
Total Votes Counted34,71934,72646,276

   + Sitting Candidate or Party
   § Figures displayed have been rounded to the nearest decimal place. Note the rounding process makes the displayed value an
     unreliable indicator, if it is within a decimal place of the required threshold, for deposit refund or public funding.